Travis Burns, Md, Drylok Original Vs Extreme?, Articles C

- Actually though, it's performance is so good that you really have to consider it a bargain, even at the $800-900 street price. Again, there's no context. It's an ideal portrait lens. Also, when shooting the heart nebula, is the sky tracker a must or not required? Online since 2011, AstroBin is the #1 complete solution for image hosting of astrophotographs. We were surprised by just how much difference there was between these AI-powered image enlargers. Hey! If you want the best possible image quality, and you must have autofocus, and you don't care if it is a bit heavy (maybe you need it for studio use), buy the Sigma. And only the cat photo has something OK (but it is a cat shot You easily get them look good). But she might as well be in front of a green screen. Perfect lens on the same level as CZ! So there - it is not a perfect object. This leaves you with a buttery bokeh and an object in perfect focus. You currently have javascript disabled. Another article that I read only the headline and saw a couple of samples then jumped directly to comments. The RedCat is deeper at 250mm, and after that, youre into 300-400mm territory which pulls galaxies and nebulae even closer. Not another article that promotes portraits shot with wide open lens and out of focus highlights in the background. Thanks to you I got a Rokinon 14mm f2.8 and a 24mm f 1.4 and am considering this lens at the moment, but wonder how it compares to the Canon 135 mm f/2. Very sharp even at f2, build quality, price, weight, autofocus is fast, bokeh, No IS, flare, autofocus isn't quite as consistent as some newer lenses, focus speed, image quality, predictability, Image quality, build like a tank, focus ring, weight. One of the prime examples of such a design is the "nifty fifty"the 50mm F1.8 lens construction that many lens manufacturers provide. Preaching to the choir! never mind.. confirmed from others that F19 is indeed the one that is excluded on this lens! Stuff I used to take the photos. Tamron has announced its 11-20mm F2.8 Di III-A RXD ultra-wide angle zoom will be made available for Fujifilm X-mount. If experience has taught me anything, its that the practical, pain-free equipment that gets the most use under the stars. SharpStar Askar ACL200 200-mm f/4 astrographic telephoto lens, Astrotrac 360 tracking platform first impression, FIELD TEST: CARL ZEISS APOCHROMATIC & SHARPEST (CZAS) BINOVIEWER, Deus_Ex_Mamiya and Michael Covington like this. IQ will rival any other lens. The Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 includes a lens hood, lens pouch, front and rear lens caps, and a 1-year Rokinon manufacturer warranty. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting sports and action, and recommended the best. Samyang/Rokinon 135mm F2 for Astrophotography: Review - YouTube If you have the 1.8 version, way to go. thanks for the write-up.. i just got this lens and have just been trying it out. Off topic, Bottom line, this is just an outstanding lens by any measure, one that makes clear why you'd want to pay the freight for expensive prime glass. Every different lens design has different "bokeh" even when the lenses are by specs same, like Canon 135mm f/2 vs Samyang 135mm f/2 are both same, but both render differently, even when both have same DOF. Yet the Jaegers becomes essentially color free when stopped down to 3in. DPReview March Madness, round one - vote! We revisit a classic DPReviewTV episode in which Chris Niccolls and Jordan Drake shoot a few rolls of Fujifilm's Acros 100 II, and a few frames on the X-T3 in Acros film simulation, to find out. Still, all things considered, I prize this lens very highly and can not imagine giving it up. You may need to refocus your subject as the temperature changes throughout the night. Orion's Belt : r/astrophotography - reddit.com Released only weeks apart, the Sony 50mm F1.4 GM and Sigma F1.4 DG DN Art are clear competitors. Over the years, I have tried more than two dozen telephoto lenses, until I finally found three or four perfect solutions. Proper composition, light and retouching are much prefferable to crazy gooey bokeh. For posed portraiture, it's a very nice budget option.FWIW, I'm a corporate portrait and event pro. After the first exposure in M mode, the camera throws an error saying Error please press the shutter button again. http://johncarnessali.com/camera-lens-tests/5109, After reading too many long, and arduous threads pertaining to the new Zeiss 135, I felt compelled to share my perspective on the wonderful Canon 135. Image quality is great, it is tack-sharp wide-open even though for partraiture, a little bit of softness is needed. There was no reason to test any other because, when stopped down to 49mm, F6.1, this lens is simply perfect, comparable to any APO on the market. I have just acquired my astrophotography set up thanks to all your videos and doing some research. I read and bought it. Due to the weight, at times I didn't move my shooting position and just zoomed to a composition that worked. The following image was captured by Eric Cauble using the Samyang branded version of this lens. Not heavy like the white tele-zooms. The Best Telephoto Lenses for Astrophotography. As rest you do just by cropping or stitching. In an effort to save money, Id like to start using a Canon 80D that we already own to start picking targets and imaging. Interesting. A higher-res Blackmagic Studio Camera just dropped. This lens is available on Amazon for most camera bodies. It seems they are now quite comparable in quality to prime lenses. Stopping down would actually have improved the picture. Mr Ericsson makes a very good point, and to go and dig irrelevant background info on him to discredit him is just well THAT is trolling. OTOH you can now get a 70-180 f2.8 zoom that weights virtually the same and is only a tiny bit longer (Tamron's on E mount, like 20mm longer than the AF SY or most other modern 135s), and there's lighter than ever 85/1.4s (eg Sigma's DN for L/E mount) that can achieve a very similar look while coming in at 600g, tho at an even higher price. Panasonic 35-100mm f2.8. I already did some trials with the Samyang 12mm lens. I think prime users get too used to the idea of bokeh as the only answer. Yuri toropin tests a bunch of lenses on Flickr which is a great source. The Rokinon 14mm F/2.8 was the first lens I had ever used like this, and these aspects do not hinder the astrophotography experience whatsoever. I loved the Nikon 80-400G for a year, or so, and then found everything with it wrong, and got rid of it. $581.00 for 7 days. You are entitled to your opinions, and I respect that! Although your target audience is beginning DSLR imagers, much of your advice also applies to using lenses with CCD cameras. Exterem apertures are extrems (wether it's full open or closed) that should be reserved for extrem cases. What's the best camera for shooting sports and action? We have come to accept that most lenses are strong in only one or two of these three factors, that I personally focus on when researching lenses to buy. As if absolutely clueless Youtube instructors who have no idea what they are talking about weren't enough. In this configuration, the lens is still a very fast F3.4. And in their task to get that blurry background, they most often throw their main subject out of focus and/or to focus for anything else in the photograph that would make it, and end results are just "gear porn". (purchased for $900), reviewed August 22nd, 2008 The best of them, Nikon's 70-200E, is just as sharp all but the very best primes - ie, already too sharp for most portrait work. But this lens changed my mind. You can also find him as @mwroll on Instagram and 500px. Now I wonder why people are never happy even on 3rd day of a new year :) Come on guys just think "Micael Widell" was working over holiday period to publish this free article ;). So so far the best that I have used are the 200f2.8L and the 400f5.6L. FULL FRAME TELEPHOTO 135mm F2.0 Based on my handful of experiences with this lens in the backyard, I have found these traits to hold true. Also, accurate guiding is essential. I rarely shoot static landscapes or posed, composed images. Robert. This is a fully manual lens, meaning that it does not have autofocus, and you must manually select the f-stop using the aperture ring at the base of the lens. Bond, I expect you to buy! I owned this lens for a long time, then traded it for the 70-200 2.8IS II. The other one is the inevitable and persistent regret that, because of chromatic aberration, the full 75mm aperture of this beautiful lens can not be used in full visible spectrum photography. Some people may disagree with the vignetting being a good thing or not, but thats a matter of taste I guess. No one yet mentioned a zoom lens, I had an opportunity to test my Canon 24-105L f/4 on M31 Andromeda Galaxy and received wonderful results with Canon 60D unmoded, I set it to 105mm, No vignatting, slight coma on the corners and no false color on bright stars. Is this Nikon already, Astro modified, without need for H alpha filters or any further modifications? It is fantastic on my old 5d. But that 10Mpix is more than enough to make a very good A3-A2 size print, but your technique needs to be very good as even slight misfocus is even more visible and the rendering faults as well. Or is there a use case for fitting the Samyang 135mm to a Panasonic gx85 (or Panasonic gh5) ?? Fast continuous shooting, reliable autofocus and great battery life are just three of the most important factors. Tack sharp at f/2. The lens has 14 stops when turning the aperture. You won't get the excessive background blurr -- which for the beginning photographer may actually be a good thing. It can isolate subject while being tack sharp with beautiful creamy bokeh when used at f2. IS would also help outside with wind. A single, 90-second exposure using the Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC at F/4. The image shown below covers 4.96 x 5.98 degrees in the constellation Cassiopeia. Dear Trevor, As soon as e.g. Test Notes The 200f2.8 L is excellent - I am using it right now. (purchased for $890), reviewed July 17th, 2006 Hi Trevor, All of them are extremely sharp and produce mouth-watering bokeh, and all of them are reasonably priced for what you get.". The 135 is lighter, but that's its only advantage. Standards have risen in recent years. (on a full frame camera)Wonderful lens for some portraiture applications, sporting events and candids at a party or event. Samyang 135mm F2 0 ED penoklatkowy obiektyw asferyczny tel Only con I can think of, and that may be a big one depending on how you plan to use the lens is the lack of weather sealing. The colder temperatures will make DSLR astrophotography much more practical, and there are plenty of great targets to choose from. Finally, to prevent image shift during exposure, all telephoto lenses must be supported at two points: at the camera end, and at the far end with a large retaining ring. In this buying guide weve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing around $2000 and recommended the best. 2. The Legendary Canon 60Da | Astrophotography DSLR (Image Examples) This lens has the Pentax K bayonet mount, and requires the K-EOS adapter for attachment to Canon EOS cameras. I should mention that I have only tested this full-frame lens using my astrophotography DSLRs, all of which are crop-sensor camera bodies. That's why I really enjoy shooting portraits with it. I've recently started using 135 and 200mm lenses from the 1970s with my mono CCD and they've proven very useful for imaging large emission nebulae. The aperture range of this lens is F/2 to F/22, with 9 diaphragm blades (aperture blades) that work in harmony to set your f-stop. This way you get both lenses with only one! (AVX). When stopped down to 37mm, at F5.4, it also produces perfect, small and round star images across the entire field. She's cold? It is so sharp it makes you rethink the use of your zoom lenses. "Bokeru" is a verb, and it can apply equally to to optical and psychological effects, including the reduced mental clarity that can some with age. I do not think telephoto lenses would be suitable for use with your modified camera. Super sharp from f2. There's literally no story!#6: Purple Flower.The isolation works because it's the only color. So I sold it for nearly what I bought it for and chalked it up to a learning experience. Just plain black plastic (no interior felt as in newer lens hoods). [emailprotected]. I use it to photograph highschool basketball in poor light. Litepanels Studio X2 Bi-Color LED Fresnel Light. There are only a handful of foolproof strategies for making a great photograph. In this review, however, I am using the lens on a crop sensor (APS-C) Canon EOS 60Da, which puts the field of view at 12.4 degrees. I liked the extra versatility of the zoom and the ability to shoot at 200mm. It must not be confused with the much cheaper SMC Takumar, often deceptively advertised as SMC Pentax Takumar, which has the M42 camera thread, and is plagued with unextinguishable blue chromatic aberration. The interest of a f/1.4 is to be able to be perfect at f/2.8, while a f/1.8 or f/2 might need to be on f/4 to have the same sharpeness and overall IQ.They are not meant to be used wide open, except in rare moments. when you hold the lens in your hand you know you are holding a fine peice of optical equipment. Looking forward to allow purchasing the Canon 200mm f/2.8L II USM. Thanks & Cheers It's sharp, has very low aberrations, no real distortion and the bokeh is very nice. So.. its like there is one F stop not being used by the lens..how do you know what click is for what F stop?? Focus are dead on with my Fullframe or APS system. I actually have to walk 1/2 way up the stairs to be able get folk in the frame. This is perhaps because I'm more of a zoom guy (I have the trio of Canon f2.8 L zoom lenses, with coverage from 16mm to 200mm), and I didn't see that big a difference between my 70-200 f2.8 and my 135 f2except I could cover a lot more with my zoom than I could with a prime. This lens provides all of these requirements. :). Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC LensCheck Price (Amazon): https://amzn.to/2MOUFeOExample Images: https://astrobackyard.com/rokinon-135mm-f2-astrophotography/I've . A tiny bit of fringing, but that would only be noticed by pixel-peepers. Youll never have to worry about losing your position just by touching the lens, but you can always tape the position down to be sure. I do not presume to further decorate the universe, and perceive them for what they are: interference. At $900 US it a relative steal. It is really thanks to another commentator pointing out something that finally makes sense out of this mess: This article is by someone who just got his first first telephoto ever, and is writing about how he feels when he is trying it out. It starts out very sharp at f/2.0, gets even sharper at f/2.8, and softens only slightly at f/11. Do you expect me to gawk? The focuser adjustment ring on the Rokinon 135mm F/2 is excellent, but fine-tuning your critical focus on a bright star at F/2 will take some trial and error to get right. etc.. Ron. Rokinon 135mm F/2 Lens for ASTROPHOTOGRAPHY - YouTube in the rain. Rain or shine, it's hard to find a camera that does all the OM-5 can for the price. This seems to be the norm for telephotos. (purchased for $899), reviewed March 19th, 2012 This includes everything from the rich star fields of Sagittarius, to a complete look at the Andromeda Galaxy. In fact, it might be fun to try! Rokinon lenses are made in Korea, and so is the Samyang variation. This lens flares easily and the flare can be especially ugly if a sun or flash are in the frame. What next, an article extolling the virtues of 43mm, or 70mm? Whos Afraid of a Phantom: Istar Phantom 140mm F/6.5, that is? The 70-200 f2.8 L2 and he 400f5.6 will however set you back way more than $1.100. Sony has added a full-frame 50mm F1.4 prime to its premium 'GM' range of E-mount lenses. We've combed through the options and selected our two favorite cameras in this class. It's not the most versatile lens, but it's very great for tight portrait shoots; background blur is creamy IMO; one of the best 'bokeh' lens. No telephoto lens I tested, nor my TSAPO65Q, was suitable for use with a DSLR "clear glass" modified to include deep red and IR. Star parties or dark sky excursions are another great time to use a camera lens in place of the telescope. You got a criticism fine say it politely, and too the point. After a three-year hiatus, we've been at the return of the CP+ camera show in Yokohama, Japan. Canon's 700-200 zooms have IS and are weather sealed two features that the 135 f/2 lacks. An update to the Mini 11, the new camera adds parallax correction capabilities, automatic flash control and a multi-function twist lens. Thanks! Well, if you consider downloading a lens image from https://www.bhphotovideo.com, and photoshop it on top of my photos to cover mistakes, and demonstrate sharpness of a lens with a jpeg that is way oversharpened; if you call knowledge that "the long focal length compresses the background" , If you call blurr a bokeh just because it sounds better, and so on 1000 words would not be enough to point out what a mess this review is Then you are right, I absolutely do not know as much as he does. Deep-sky astrophotography is often associated with a camera and telescope, but the truth is there are a lot of great camera lenses for astrophotography out there. Canon EOS 60Da with the Rokinon 135mm F/2 lens. With no general agreement about what Bokeh is it is little wonder that there is so much argument and disagreement. It just doesn't get any better than this! No rubber sealing against the camera body tend to give me the creeps when shooting in the wet. The finish and texture of the Rokinon 135mm F/2 is a step up from the 14mm F/2.8 I ordered a few years ago. Although if Bokeh and sharpness is your thing and you can live with MF the Laowa 105mm f/2 Smooth Trans Focus (STF) is amazing. (purchased for $860), reviewed March 9th, 2017 However, stepping outside to polar align a small star tracker and attach a DSLR and lens is quick and painless. OM System's latest lens is a whopper of a macro, featuring optical stabilization, full weather sealing, up to 2x magnification and a whole lot more. Then you should have tried the 180mm nikkor ED, the old one, which is the favorite tool of a lot of astrophotographers. When all that was available were APS-C crop cameras a 85mm lens provided a near equivalent view angle to the 135mm on a full frame camera. There is no agreement about what Bokeh means. (purchased for $890), reviewed October 21st, 2005 I do not like this. It may be superfluous to add, but it can't do any harm, that in astrophotography all shutter control must be done with a wired or wireless electrical shutter release swith. (purchased for $725), reviewed March 26th, 2013 The extent of this influence lies mainly in photographer's perception and creativity.As all arts photography may serve given needs due to numerous reasons with the resulting integrity of the work not necessarily suggesting art.The photographic gear (from lens cleaning tissues up to s/w) is just the tool(s) of a photographer in order to produce its work. And you can even crop a 135 efl with today's sensors should you actually need it. Since Eric was so generous to share his images with me, I had to include his photo of the Rho Ophiuchi cloud complex as well. When the aperture is stopped down to 37mm using step-down filter rings, this lens produces incredibly tiny pinpoint star images from edge to edge. It seems lazy to me. Large hood. Given the spot on DPR front page, lots of 'what-lens-should-I-buy' newbies will be spending their money on this one.